Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.24/554
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, João M. S.-
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorBenbenishty, Rami-
dc.contributor.authorDavidson-Arad, Bilha-
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Vânia-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-13T12:51:41Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-13T12:51:41Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCarvalho, J. M. S., Delgado, P., Benbenishty, R., Davidson-Arad, B., & Pinto, V. (2017). Professional Judgments and Decisions on Placement in Foster Care and Reunification in Portugal. European Journal of Social Work, ?? (?), ???-???. First published online.pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn1369-1457-
dc.identifier.issn1468-2664-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.24/554-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to analyse professional judgements and decisions made in the Portuguese child care system in face of a case vignette of child maltreatment. Using the approach proposed by Benbenishty et al. [(2015). Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’ child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 63–75. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015], we assessed the decisions of professionals, such as to place the child in foster care or reunify her with her family, on the basis of a series of judgements (e.g. substantiation of alleged abuse and neglect, risk assessments) that are influenced by the characteristics of the case, the decision-making context, and mother's and child's wishes. We conclude that there are different approaches to the case based on different professionals' attitudes that can be classified in two groups: one more pro-removal and the other anti-removal. These groups presented different risk assessments and intervention recommendations, and their decisions where significantly influenced by the mother's and child's wishes. Furthermore, we have done comparisons with studies made in other countries, concluding that the country context can be an important factor that leads to different outcomes. Implications for both practice and research are presented.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147304/PTpt_PT
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectFoster carept_PT
dc.subjectReunificationpt_PT
dc.subjectAssessmentpt_PT
dc.subjectChild abusept_PT
dc.subjectchild care policy and practicept_PT
dc.titleProfessional Judgments and Decisions on Placement in Foster Care and Reunification in Portugalpt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpt_PT
degois.publication.firstPage1pt_PT
degois.publication.lastPage15pt_PT
degois.publication.titleEuropean Journal of Social Workpt_PT
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13691457.2017.1291494pt_PT
Aparece nas colecções:Artigos em revistas indexadas

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Carvalho et al. 2017.pdf236,68 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.