Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.24/554
Título: Professional Judgments and Decisions on Placement in Foster Care and Reunification in Portugal
Autor: Carvalho, João M. S.
Delgado, Paulo
Benbenishty, Rami
Davidson-Arad, Bilha
Pinto, Vânia
Palavras-chave: Foster care
Reunification
Assessment
Child abuse
child care policy and practice
Data: 2017
Citação: Carvalho, J. M. S., Delgado, P., Benbenishty, R., Davidson-Arad, B., & Pinto, V. (2017). Professional Judgments and Decisions on Placement in Foster Care and Reunification in Portugal. European Journal of Social Work, ?? (?), ???-???. First published online.
Resumo: This study aims to analyse professional judgements and decisions made in the Portuguese child care system in face of a case vignette of child maltreatment. Using the approach proposed by Benbenishty et al. [(2015). Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’ child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 63–75. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015], we assessed the decisions of professionals, such as to place the child in foster care or reunify her with her family, on the basis of a series of judgements (e.g. substantiation of alleged abuse and neglect, risk assessments) that are influenced by the characteristics of the case, the decision-making context, and mother's and child's wishes. We conclude that there are different approaches to the case based on different professionals' attitudes that can be classified in two groups: one more pro-removal and the other anti-removal. These groups presented different risk assessments and intervention recommendations, and their decisions where significantly influenced by the mother's and child's wishes. Furthermore, we have done comparisons with studies made in other countries, concluding that the country context can be an important factor that leads to different outcomes. Implications for both practice and research are presented.
Peer review: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.24/554
DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2017.1291494
ISSN: 1369-1457
1468-2664
Aparece nas colecções:Artigos em revistas indexadas

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Carvalho et al. 2017.pdf236,68 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex MendeleyEndnote Degois 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.